home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Hackers Underworld 2: Forbidden Knowledge
/
Hackers Underworld 2: Forbidden Knowledge.iso
/
UNDERGRD
/
VOL_1
/
CUD104A.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-11-01
|
18KB
|
457 lines
****************************************************************************
>C O M P U T E R U N D E R G R O U N D<
>D I G E S T<
*** Volume 1, Issue #1.04 (April 11, 1990) **
-- Part 1 of 4 --
** ALCOR'S SUIT AGAINST E-MAIL CONFISCATION **
****************************************************************************
MODERATORS: Jim Thomas / Gordon Meyer
REPLY TO: TK0JUT2@NIU.bitnet
COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
diverse views.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent the
views of the moderators. Contributors assume all responsibility
for assuring that articles submitted do not violate copyright
protections.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In This Issue:
Issue #1.04 is long--over 2,100 lines--so we have broken it down
into four smaller files.
Keith Henson sent these public documents to us describing how one
organization filed suit against agents for allegedly confiscating
electronic mail illegally. The case raises a number of important issues to
computerists, including the status of E-mail as private communication, the
scope of investigatory authority of law enforcement agents in confiscating
computer "symbols," and other facets of investigation of the use of
computers when an alleged crime has occured.
We encourage article-type responses to the any of the many issues raised
here.
**********************************
PART 1 of 4
**********************************
From _The Press-Enterprise_ Saturday, Feb 24, 1990
(Posted by Alcor member Keith Henson without permission)
ALCOR FILES SUIT OVER ELECTRONIC MAIL SEIZURE
By David Bloom, The Press-Enterprise
Another legal battle has erupted between Alcor Life Extension Foundation
and the law, this time with a federal lawsuit filed by Alcor over the
seizure more than two years ago of computerized "electronic mail" during a
search of the group%s Riverside headquarters.
Alcor members pay up to $100,000 for the privilege of have their bodies
put in cryonic suspension, frozen at temperatures hundreds of degrees below
zero, after their death. The members hope developing medical technology
will one day enable the to be revived and cured.
The group ran afoul of local law enforcement officials, however, after
the cryonic suspension of the head of Dora Kent in December 1987.
The Riverside County coroner's Office accused Alcor members of hastening
along Kent's death with a lethal dose of barbiturates in preparation for
freezing. The group has denied the accusation, saying the provided only
"care and comfort" to the 83 year-old Kent in her last two days.
Law enforcement officers raided the Alcor headquarters on Riverside's
southwest edge in January 1988, searching for computer equipment, software
and related material, and for Kent's body parts, and any illegal drugs.
They found the equipment, but not Kent, whose head had been secreted
away, or any illegal drugs.
The most recent lawsuit was filed last month in U.S. District court in
Los Angeles. It accuses a dozen Riverside City and County law enforcement
officials of violating the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986.
The suit says police illegally seized the electronic mail of 14 Alcor
members when it seized the computer equipment. A copy of the search
warrant included as an exhibit in the suit does not mention electronic
mail.
The suit asked for at least $10,000 for each of the alcor member who
filed the suit. Most to the same members filed a claim against the city 11
months ago, but the city allowed the claim to expire without response after
45 days, said attorney John Porter, who is representing the city and two
policemen named in the suit.
"This lawsuit was filed in federal court," Porter said. "It should have
been filed the Twilight Zone."
The attorney for Alcor could not be reach for comment late yesterday.
Date: Tue, 27-Mar-90 20:17:46 PST
From _The Press-Enterprise_ Saturday, Feb 24, 1990
(Posted by Alcor member Keith Henson without permission)
ALCOR FILES SUIT OVER ELECTRONIC MAIL SEIZURE
By David Bloom, The Press-Enterprise
Another legal battle has erupted between Alcor Life Extension Foundation
and the law, this time with a federal lawsuit filed by Alcor over the
seizure more than two years ago of computerized "electronic mail" during a
search of the group%s Riverside headquarters.
Alcor members pay up to $100,000 for the privilege of have their bodies
put in cryonic suspension, frozen at temperatures hundreds of degrees below
zero, after their death. The members hope developing medical technology
will one day enable the to be revived and cured.
The group ran afoul of local law enforcement officials, however, after
the cryonic suspension of the head of Dora Kent in December 1987.
The Riverside County coroner's Office accused Alcor members of hastening
along Kent's death with a lethal dose of barbiturates in preparation for
freezing. The group has denied the accusation, saying the provided only
"care and comfort" to the 83 year-old Kent in her last two days.
Law enforcement officers raided the Alcor headquarters on Riverside's
southwest edge in January 1988, searching for computer equipment, software
and related material, and for Kent's body parts, and any illegal drugs.
They found the equipment, but not Kent, whose head had been secreted
away, or any illegal drugs.
The most recent lawsuit was filed last month in U.S. District court in
Los Angeles. It accuses a dozen Riverside City and County law enforcement
officials of violating the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986.
The suit says police illegally seized the electronic mail of 14 Alcor
members when it seized the computer equipment. A copy of the search
warrant included as an exhibit in the suit does not mention electronic
mail.
The suit asked for at least $10,000 for each of the alcor member who
filed the suit. Most to the same members filed a claim against the city 11
months ago, but the city allowed the claim to expire without response after
45 days, said attorney John Porter, who is representing the city and two
policemen named in the suit.
"This lawsuit was filed in federal court," Porter said. "It should have
been filed the Twilight Zone."
The attorney for Alcor could not be reach for comment late yesterday.
Subject: Re: ECPA suit-court filing
Date: Tue, 27-Mar-90 20:18:18 PST
CHRISTOPHER ASHWORTH, A Member of
GARFIELD, TEPPER, ASHWORTH & EPSTEIN
1925 Century Part East, Suite 1250
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (213) 277-1981
Attorneys For Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case NO. SA CV90-021 JSL (RwRx)
COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY RELIEF
AND DAMAGES
(Electronic
Communications Privacy
Act of 1986;
18 U.S.C. Section 2701,
et seq.)
H. KEITH HENSON, HUGH L. HIXON,
JR., THOMAS K. DONALDSON, NAOMI
REYNOLDS, ROGER GREGORY, MICHAEL G.
FEDEROWITCZ, STEVEN B. HARRIS,
BRIAN WOWK, ERIC GEISLINGER,
CATH WOOF, BILLY H. SEIDEL,
ALLEN J. LOPP, LEE CORBIN
RALPH MERKEL, AND KEITH LOFTSTROM
Plaintiffs,
v.
RAYMOND CARRILLO, SCOTT HILL,
DAN CUPIDO, ALAN KUNZMAN, ROWE
WORTHINGTON, RICHARD BOGAN,
REAGAN SCHMALZ, GROVER TRASK, II,
ROBERT SPITZER, LINFORD L.
RICHARDSON, GUY PORTILLO,
individuals, and the COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, a subdivision of the
State of CAlifornia, And the CITY
OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal entity,
and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive,
Defendants.
Plaintiffs complain of defendants as follows:
JURISDICTIONAL ALLEGATION